Smile Proportions in Cosmetic Dentistry

beautiful smile, smile proportions

Smile Makeovers are only part of the Story

- But What is Beauty? -

Often considered as a manifestation of perfection, beauty is cherished by us all. More than merely physical, the essence of beauty contains both a spiritual and an emotional element, which touches many aspects of our lives. While it may not be the most essential of our values, beauty has the power of drawing attention and eliciting respect and admiration in the eye of the beholder. Its roots run deep below the surface of society - and effect each of us. Cosmetic dentist Dr. Claude Rufenacht wrote a wonderful book about the many facets and interactions between cosmetic dentistry and the holistic view of beauty and aesthetics. (see reference below)

While beauty cannot be measured, harmony - which is most often associated with beauty - can be expressed in formulas. Disregarding ornamentation such as make-up and hair style, facial harmony can be calculated according to such formulas, dictating a sort of blueprint for the ideal human face.

Recent studies on the best-paid magazine models revealed the current ideal of facial aesthetics:

  • a slightly protruding mouth profile
  • a clear outline of bony structure
  • a permanent display of upper teeth
  • a short and full upper lip and, quite naturally


Cosmetic Dentistry and Beauty?

Cosmetic dentists rely on more than pure intuition. While the appraisal of the lower one third of the face is an integral part of assessing facial beauty, a cosmetic dentist looks at various angles, in three dimensions, and at depper levels of anatomy and function.

Cosmetic Dentistry is not a new specialty. Ornamentation of teeth and the human body have been observed for thousands of years. However, the election of a smile design with porcelain veneers is an expression of a striving for a better quality of life as a dental patient and the desire to have a positive impact on people's lives as a cosmetic dentist.

Until recently, dentistry was merely a technical specialty with a medical orientation. Functionality has always been of paramount concern, however, in the past, aesthetic outcomes were secondary, because the strongest dental materials were metallic. They still are. However, today we have non-metallic materials available that, together with meticulous bonding techniques, allow us to restore teeth to native function and aesthetics. A new aesthetic standard has developed on our societies.

Cosmetic Dentistry is not just 'cosmetic'.

The word 'cosmetic' derives from the greek language meaning embellishing or adorning. Dentistry does not embellish, but strives for establishing functional and aesthetic harmony.

Each optimum solution contains an aesthetic element. We see this in every aspect of life, such as landscaping, automotives, body care, in fact everywhere in our envirenments of livingness. However, the most impressive architectural masterpieces are not just beautiful but also harmoniously integrated into their environment. The pyramids of Gizeh are monuments of a perfect solution. The use of oxidized metal (which is stone) in an oxygen-containing atmosphere, a pyramid form at the gravitational forces of about 9.8 m/s². They demonstrate that perfect harmony contains both internal harmony and complete balance with the environment.

The most important aspect of cosmetic dentistry is a thorough analysis of the existing conditions. Teeth have numerous functions. They help to organize food in our mouth, process it prior to its transportation to the digestive system, and they communicate with the CNS about location, size, texture, hardness, and toughness of the food particles. The tongue and oral tissues contribute by indicating other tactile senses as well as taste. In fact, the earliest teeth found in conodonts who existed on this planet about 480 million years ago, indicate the primary sensory function of teeth. Studies at the periodontal apparatus of modern teeth clearly underline their sensory purpose. (


References:
Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Quintessence Publishing 1990.
Naini FB et al. The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130(3); 277-282.
Bradley J et al. Mentored by nature. J Cosmetic Dentistry 2004; 20(1); 82-86.
Hanihara T et al. Metric dental variation of major human populations. Am J Phys Anthropology 2005; 128(2); 287-298.
Hasanreisoglu U et al. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosth Dentistry 2005; 94(6); 530-538.
Goldstein RE. Study of need of esthetics in dentistry. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1969; 21(6); 589-598.
Golub-Evans J. How to be a smile designer, Part 1. Dentistry Today 2003; 22(11); 66-68.
LeSage B et al. Approaches to Smile Design - Mathematical to Artistic Interpretation. J Cosmetic Dentistry 2012; 28(1); 126-147.
Long HA. Interpersonal and Clinical Protocol for Rejuvenating a Smile with Cosmetic Restorative Dentistry. Cont Esthet 2006; 10(7); 42-51.
Miller CJ. Esthetic Dentistry - The Smile Line as a Guide to Anterior Esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33(2); 157-164.
Morley J. The role of cosmetic dentistry in restoring a youthful appearance. J Amer Dental Association 1999; 130(8); 166-172.
Morley J et al. Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Amer Dental Association 2001; 132(1); 39-45.
Pankey LD. Oral rehabilitation - Part II. Reconstruction of the upper teeth using a functionally generated path technique. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1960; 10(1); 151-162.
Parekh SM et al. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod 2006; 76(4); 557-563.
Schuyler CH. Human tooth form and arrangement from the anthropologic approach by Charles H Moses. J Prosth Dentistry 1959; 213-214.
Waldman AB. Smile design for the adolescent patient--interdisciplinary management of anterior tooth size discrepancies. J Calif Dental Association 2008; 36(5); 365-372.
Beall AE. Can a New Smile Make You Look More Intelligent and Successful? Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51(2); 289-297.
Beder OE. Esthetics - An Enigma. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1971; 25(6); 588-591.
Chu SJ, A biometric approach to predictable treatment of clinical crown discrepancies. Pract Proced Aesthetic Dentistry 2007; 19(7); 401-409.
Haupt JR et al. Subtle embrasures and a youthful smile. AACD Journal 1997; Fall; 58-62.
Işiksal E. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129(1); 8-16.
Johnson PF. Racial norms: esthetic and prosthodontic implications. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1992; 67(4); 502-508.
Ker AJ et al. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dental Association 2008; 139(10); 1318-1327.
Kokich VO et al. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130(2); 141-151.
Mahshid M et al. Evaluation of "golden proportion" in individuals with an esthetic smile. J Esthetic Restorative Dentistry 2004; 16(3); 185-192.
Miller CJ. Esthetic Dentistry - The Smile Line as a Guide to Anterior Esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33(2); 157-164.
Moses CH. Human tooth form and arrangement from the anthropologic approach. J Prosth Dent 1959; 9(2); 197-212.
Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosth Dent 1978; 40(3); 244-252.
Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosth Dent 1973; 29(4); 358-382.
Ong E. Peer assessment of dental attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130(2); 163-169.
Parekh SM. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod 2006; 76(4); 557-563.
Ritter DE et al. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod 2006; 76(2); 198-203.
Sarver DM et al. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124(1); 4-12.
Sarver DM et al. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124(2); 116-127.
Magne P et al. Anatomic Crown Width/Length Ratios of Unworn and Worn Maxillary Teeth in White Subjects. J Prosth Dent 2003; 89(5); 453-461.
Schwartz GT et al. Sexual dimorphism in modern human permanent teeth. Am J Phys Anthropology 2005; 128(2); 312-317.
Sesemann MR. The diagnostic tracing analysis--visualization by the numbers. Pract Proced Aesthetic Dentistry 2004; 16(8); 567-572.
Sterrett JD et al. Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26(3); 153-157.
Vig RG. The kinetics of anterior tooth display. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1978; 39(5); 502-504.
Weinstein SP. Classification of clinical attributes in tooth appearance. Pract Proced Aesthetic Dentistry 2008; 20(3); 143-151.
Wells DJ. The Lateral Incisor: The Unsung Hero in Smile Design. AACD Journal 1999; Fall; 38-46.
Wolfart S. Subjective and objective perception of upper incisors. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 33(7); 489-495.
Ackerman MB et al. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36(4); 221-236.
Ackerman JL et al. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res 1998; 1(1); 2-11.
Magne P et al. Anatomic Crown Width/Length Ratios of Unworn and Worn Maxillary Teeth in White Subjects. J Prosthetic Dentistry 2003; 89(5); 453-461.
Park YS et al. The three-dimensional relationship on a virtual model between the maxillary anterior teeth and incisive papilla. J Prosthetic Dentistry 2007; 98(4); 312-318.
Spear F. Interdisciplinary management of anterior dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(2); 160-169.
Spear F. A multidisciplinary approach to esthetic dentistry. Dental Clinics of North America 2007; 51(2); 487-505.
Davis NC. Smile Design. Dental Clinics of North America 2007; 51(2); 299-318.
Miller EL et al. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1979; 41(6); 657-660.
Bjorndal AM. Anatomic measurements of human teeth extracted from males between the ages of 17 and 21 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974; 38(5); 791-803.
Ferrario VF. Three-dimensional inclination of the dental axes in healthy permanent dentitions--A cross-sectional study in a normal population. Angle Orthod 2001; 71(4); 257-264.
Arnett GW et al. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103(4); 299-312.
Arnett GW et al. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning--Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103(5); 395-411.

Read more about our aesthetic dentistry procedures: